Lord of the Rings - The two towers

I did not really like it …

Gollum does not look as impressive as I hoped he would, still too much hints that he is a CGI

alot of things are too small, for example the Ents, the City of those Horsepeople (a small house and a few twenty huts … thats the “big” city of these people ?), I really miss the bombastic feel of the first movie

stupid jokes with the dwarf

those stupid elve-women again (cant stand cate blanchett)

waay too much of those scenery-shots (I dont think I will go to new zealand ever in my life, seems I’ve seen all of it by now)

and alot of unbelievable stupid stuff like frodo using his cape to look like a stone, aragorn popping up right infront of an orc-army without being noticed, the ents destroy this small wall and a shitload of water comes out …

Overall the movie is a must-see, no doubt, but I still was abit disappointed.

Thanks for bashing it, now it can only be good or better than expected when i go see it ;)

I liked it nearly as much as the first, certainly worth a watch, but far from perfect. I actually really enjoyed the scenery shots, but I agree that the bloody dwarf should be strangled. Also, some of the script is REALLY dodgy. I certainly wouldn’t call it a masterpiece, but it’s a great film.

the dwarf should be respected, not strangled. just because he is short does not make him a clown. :D

Yeah too bad the actor who plays mr dwarf has some weird political viewpoints. <_<

extremely hot, better than the first :)))

I am a LOR newbie…
I’ve never read any of Tolkien’s books…
I just saw The Fellowship of the Ring yesterday on DVD…
I loved it…
I will read all books…
I can’t wait to see 2 towers!
:yeah:

To me the 2 towers is a big disappointment. It’s a nice and entertaining movie in itself, but since I have read the book there’s some things that I think are a shame (though other might think otherwise).

First of all, Saruman seems to be wanting to destroy all humans (???, unless I missed something I didn’t think genocide was in the book. I thought Saruman just wanted to rule (whether it be humans/orcs/elves/rodents/cockroaches doesn’t matter)).

Second, there’s a scene where Saruman talks to the people of dunland and tells them the people of Rohan are evil and yare yare… ok true, but where in the movie are they seen again? Maybe they have some part in movie #3, but in the book they’re in the assault of Helm’s deep.

Third, why are the elves in Helm’s deep… Ok I understand for moviepurposes you’re limited to a certain number of characters thus Haldir is brought on the scene again. But still… (no biggie)

4; Why do wargs look more like Hyena’s than wolves? At least, maybe on 2nd look they don’t, but it seemed to me they did.

#5; Strangely enough Rohan is just a very very small country of a few hundred people and therefor all of their people go to Helm’s deep (there’s other strongholds).

7, Faramir is a man of different character than in the book. In the book he’s a good, fair, honest man with no lust for power. In the movie however he’s just like Boromir and trying to take the ring to Minas Tirith. I guess this is to emphasize the fact that they are brothers. Still brothers can be very different in nature.

6 ;) Rohan looks very hilly. I imagined it to be more flat… guess there isn’t much of that in New zealand :P

  1. The ents are cool, but again the story is changed. The decide not to interfere cause Saruman did no harm to them. But when Treebeard sees the destruction of his trees he gets angry and then they attack. This is a needless change, cause I think the ents would know when someone was destroying their forrests wouldn’t they? They’re tree sheppards for crying out loud. Also when Merry & Pippin enter the forrest it looks more like the swamp on Dagobah.

  2. Haldir is really prolonging his death scene :P
    Ok for dramatation purposes, but hell…

  3. The mumakil (elephant) looks awesome.

I guess there’s much more I can say about it, but nothing comes to mind.

All in all, it’s an entertaining movie. Not quite as good as the first cause there’s more differences (the 3rd will have even more no doubt) which are not always to the better. Maybe this is also because I have read the book and the people who are introduced to the world of Middle Earth will have no problems with this.

Read the books and see the movie a socond time! Obviously you have missed something cause both of them are f----ing great! Don’t look at the details, try to grasp the concept of it. The movie is marvellous, but it takes an open mind to view it. :)

But only in the long DVD-version. In the normal version this is not shown…