Jump to content


Photo

SoundCloud Quietly Decreased Its Audio Quality by Half?

soundcloud

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 El°HYM

El°HYM

    Big Super GrandMasta Member

  • Normal Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 761 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NIBIRU
  • Interests:I AM El°HYM

Posted 05 January 2018 - 23:21

Outrage ensued after one SoundCloud user thought he discovered the platform had cut its audio file bitrate in half. In reality, SoundCloud has transitioned from streaming MP3s to Opus files, an audio file format that is supposedly superior. Claire Lobenfeld breaks Opus down and gets into how it can benefit you, the listener.

 

After making headlines throughout 2017 for layoffs and cashflow problems, SoundCloud is kicking off this year with more controversy. An uproar ignited after New Jersey producer Direct’s tweets about an alleged downgrade in SoundCloud’s audio quality went viral. Here’s the reality: SoundCloud has ditched 128kbps MP3 files for 64kbps Opus files and the company itself is claiming no change to audio quality. “We have been using the Opus codec (among others) since 2016, and we regularly test different combinations of encoding and streaming to offer listeners a quality experience on any device,” a spokesperson told Billboard in response to backlash. “Furthermore, we store all content from creators at its originally uploaded quality level so we can continually adapt to advances in encoding and playback.” So why, then, is the bitrate chopped in half?

 

 

Continue: http://www.factmag.c...t-is-opus-audio


Inside ur Renoise; helping Byte-Smasher putting Cab Sims on ur Master.  :ph34r: 


#2 Sonnenuhr

Sonnenuhr

    New Member

  • Normal Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 27 January 2018 - 22:49

oh wow ... never heard of this change. but some weeks ago made a mix with some grabbed soundcloudfiles by a downloader and sometimes sound ... uuuuuuh ... sounds

really bad sometimes ... but wasn´t so sure, to be honest. Hm, other stuff at sc is even more annoying to my point of view.



#3 El°HYM

El°HYM

    Big Super GrandMasta Member

  • Normal Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 761 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NIBIRU
  • Interests:I AM El°HYM

Posted 27 January 2018 - 23:33


Inside ur Renoise; helping Byte-Smasher putting Cab Sims on ur Master.  :ph34r: 


#4 Meef Chaloin

Meef Chaloin

    Big Masta Member

  • Normal Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 526 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 January 2018 - 02:07

No, they didn't.



#5 Skolskoly

Skolskoly

    Chief Above Chief Member

  • Normal Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 295 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:probably not behind you.
  • Interests:Music, Video games, computers, coding

Posted 29 January 2018 - 01:06

I've listened to music encoded with the Opus codec and I have to say it's impressive. An Opus file can sound pretty close to an mp3 of twice the bitrate, so Soundcloud isn't necessarily lying when they say they haven't decreased the "audio quality." They're obviously taking cost cutting measures here though, which isn't surprising, although it is somewhat concerning. I imagine there are probably some edge cases with the codec which will sound worse just because of the decreased bitrate.







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: soundcloud