A Few Ideas

[BonusNinja]

*The spectrum view in v1.28 was better, would you consider changing it?

*I’d like to see dec instead of hex numbers in the top-right instument window.

*Multi output for RNI. It would be extremely nice if you could assign each sample from your drumkit to seperate channels.

*Don’t really know how to explain this but here goes.
When inserting a new track e.g. when the cursor is on track 00 you’ll insert track 08 and the track order will be as following: track 08, track 00, track 01 and so on, wouldn’t it be better if the order was: track 00, 01 ending with track 08?

I hope you understand me.

[keith303]

*I’d like to see dec instead of hex numbers in the top-right instument window.

i guess that won’t be possible, since currently we’re able to use up to 128 slots for samples / instruments, so we’re talking about a hexadecimal range of 00-7F. in the pattern, note entries are related to a two-digit instrument number, 00-7F.
now if this would be changed to decimal numbering, we’d either lose 28 instrument slots, or the devs would have to expand the instrument number column to three digits.

[Johan]

*Don’t really know how to explain this but here goes.
When inserting a new track e.g. when the cursor is on track 00 you’ll insert track 08 and the track order will be as following: track 08, track 00, track 01 and so on, wouldn’t it be better if the order was: track 00, 01 ending with track 08?

I hope you understand me.

You can drag n drop the tracks afterwards…

[BonusNinja]

*The spectrum view in v1.28 was better, would you consider changing it?

Maybe it was better to use, but I doubt it was better in terms of precision. The current one rivals the Waves PAZ Analyzer. http://www.waves.com/default.asp?url=conte…tent.asp?id=154

Ok, maybe I just have to get used to it.

[BonusNinja]

*I’d like to see dec instead of hex numbers in the top-right instument window.

i guess that won’t be possible, since currently we’re able to use up to 128 slots for samples / instruments, so we’re talking about a hexadecimal range of 00-7F. in the pattern, note entries are related to a two-digit instrument number, 00-7F.
now if this would be changed to decimal numbering, we’d either lose 28 instrument slots, or the devs would have to expand the instrument number column to three digits.

I wouldn’t mind if the DEC numbers were optional, not everybody use more than 100 instruments.

But Some people might wanna use more than 128 samples/instruments so…

how abot that 3 digit expansion?

[vvoois (vV)]

*Don’t really know how to explain this but here goes.
When inserting a new track e.g. when the cursor is on track 00 you’ll insert track 08 and the track order will be as following: track 08, track 00, track 01 and so on, wouldn’t it be better if the order was: track 00, 01 ending with track 08?

I hope you understand me.

You can drag n drop the tracks afterwards…

And you can manually rename them yourself by doubleclicking the trackname.

[BonusNinja]

*The spectrum view in v1.28 was better, would you consider changing it?

Maybe it was better to use, but I doubt it was better in terms of precision. The current one rivals the Waves PAZ Analyzer. http://www.waves.com/default.asp?url=conte…tent.asp?id=154

Ok, maybe I just have to get used to it.

If you want bars, use this: C-plugs

Don’t forget to decrease the latency with the exclamation mark (!) button. By default, it’s over a hundred ms but you can get it as low as 5 ms.

Nice, just what I was looking for! Thanx…

[BonusNinja]

*Don’t really know how to explain this but here goes.
When inserting a new track e.g. when the cursor is on track 00 you’ll insert track 08 and the track order will be as following: track 08, track 00, track 01 and so on, wouldn’t it be better if the order was: track 00, 01 ending with track 08?

I hope you understand me.

You can drag n drop the tracks afterwards…

And you can manually rename them yourself by doubleclicking the trackname.

But still…

[cyberwax]

*Don’t really know how to explain this but here goes.
When inserting a new track e.g. when the cursor is on track 00 you’ll insert track 08 and the track order will be as following: track 08, track 00, track 01 and so on, wouldn’t it be better if the order was: track 00, 01 ending with track 08?

I hope you understand me.

You can drag n drop the tracks afterwards…

And you can manually rename them yourself by doubleclicking the trackname.

But still…

yes. The layout of quotes got pretty cool, i agree.

[BonusNinja]

Huh?