Possible i guess, but it most likely shall mean you have to restart Renoise if you want to change this aspect (regardless if you want to turn it on or off). Audiobuffering is determined upon driver initialisation.
I noticed 5-10% LOWER cpu usage on 2 of my songs. Both of them uses very heavy weight vst’s.
Im using M-Audio ASIO drivers here.
ROK!
Yeah, with the ASIO drivers you have indeed lower CPU usage due to the SSE improvements that have been implemented. So you definately have a good reason to invest in a good ASIO card now.
hmmm… I hate being a poor student 
by the way, please consider one vote more for “Nope… they’re actually lower”, and one less for “Yes, but not that much”, because I’m stupid and I’ve voted for the wrong option 
neither nor over here
…
I have Pentium M 1.6 GHz here, 512 MB RAM. No such huge problems here… OK, no Edirol Orchestra but still with a bunch of bigger VSTi’s, the CPU usage seems very similar to what it was. However, the lack of buffering is noticeable so I also hope that this will be configurable in the end (even at the expense of disabling internal recording).
Not all of us have ASIO cards… yet 
I think I’ll fill up a bug report on having an option for this. I don’t think it will made it to 1.8.0. Maybe for 1.8.1…
Just tried asio4all to see if that fixed it… but asio4all seems to think someone’s still trying to use the soundcard in some other way when I load up Renoise, so it disables the asio emulation. Odd behaviour… so I guess that doesn’t fix my problem
got exactly the same problem with ASIO4ALL on my 2ndary PC (P3-866Mhz + super cheap “Soundblaster PCI 128”).
not sure if it’s ASIO4ALL’s or renoise’s fault here.
I’m apt to blame it on the soundcard myself… I’ve got a soundmax chipset on my laptop… which probably can’t handle asio4all trying to hijack it’s way in as a low level device driver without shutting down all other sound processes
I just ran a quick test with two VSTi’s playing one three note chord on each. The CPU usage was pretty much identical. Not sure if this is subject to change where more and/or heavier VSTs are involved.
I have two computers: Evo n800w laptop (Intel P4m 2,2 GHz) and desktop with AMD Athlon 2100+, both using DirectSound.
CPU levels on desktop are quite same as with version 1.5, but I have noticed high CPU usage when working with Renoise 1.8b4 and laptop. Songs which use something like 40-50% of CPU on desktop use mainly same amount of CPU on laptop, but there are moments when CPU-usage grows dramatically and reaches 100%.
I hope you have not set your laptop CPU to stepping mode (you can turn it off in powermanagement and hopefully BIOS as well), because these specific power-saving mechanisms do not work well with any CPU intensive software.
Alot higher at my place aswell. Worried
Currently working on:
AMD 64 Athlon 2300 2,3Ghz
2G DDRAM (Licenced!) XP Home
Tascam US-122 USB soundcard.
Hard peaks is akso appering. never happend before.
ASIO - yes
Thanks! Now my laptop doesn’t jam totally anymore when playing song. Now the laptop is using 75% of CPU when playing the song, whereas the desktop AMD is using only 47% of CPU when playing same song…
I thought your desktop was Intel and your laptop AMD?
Anyway: Intel ain’t AMD, your desktop’s chipset ain’t your laptop’s chipset and so forth… it’s still comparing apples with peers.
But i’m glad you could reduce the problem.
Hmm… I just realized that you don’t have to turn CPU stepping off from BIOS separately. Changing power scheme to “allways on” or “Home office/desk” from XP’s power management options turns also stepping off. It seems that doing it this way does the thing better because now the song is running on my laptop consuming max. 43% of CPU!
Thank you very much from your advice vvoois! Renoise has never worked better!!! Thanks go also to the Renoise-team for the best tracker ever!
StBe / Trackin’ since 1991
StBe, your words confirm me that I’ve made the right thing when I decided not to buy a notebook for music. My songs are extremely CPU and RAM intensive, and notebooks are just still not the right tool for certain type of music composition
ok, but when I think at a notebook, I think at a tool-in-a-box which would let me compose while I’m on a train or at a demoparty exactly as if I were at home.
Present notebooks have not this characteristic because their battery time is still unsatisfactory, and since you need to disable the power-saving capabilities of the CPU in order for it to perform better, then the whole concept of power-saving of new notebooks is thrown away.
I have a desktop AMD 64X2 4200+ which has Cool&Quiet powersaving system. Though far from being really quiet (mostly because of hard disks and case noises), the CPU still works perfectly with C&Q enabled. Some of my songs require even 75% of this CPU power at times, and I doubt that there is a notebook capable of handling this at the moment. By the way, I’ve seen that some notebooks are being sold with big SATA HDs, though, and this is a very good enhancement.
Also, if I need to plug in an external soundcard to get decent latency, then there is even less interest.
Moreover, there is a compromise to be made between transportability and size of the monitor, which is an important factor when working with Renoise. Not that I can’t use it on a 14" screen (which I do on my Celeron 466 notebook, using RNS1.5), but if I would buy a notebook now, after 6.5 years after have bought my present one, I would at least search for something bigger, i.e. less transportable.
Oh well… I will just keep using my desktop, that’s all 