Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Modulation Envelope - Min size is 256ms, can it be lower please?


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 redhoot

redhoot

    Member

  • Normal Members
  • PipPip
  • 36 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 February 2018 - 11:25

Heya,

 

Doing some granular mangling with phrases, sample offsets and envelopes. The volume envelope can only be set to 256ms at the shortest; some of the grain stuff im doing is around 25ms. Would it be possible to have this limit removed ? It would allow for more efficient CPU usage when using really short envelopes.

 

Hope that makes sense!

 

 

  IfWwmdul.png

 

 

PS. Absolutely love the new instrument in R3 and Redux, the complexity and depth of what you can create is really something!


Edited by redhoot, 13 February 2018 - 11:25.


#2 gentleclockdivider

gentleclockdivider

    Guruh Motha Fakka is Levitating and Knows Everything About Renoise Member

  • Normal Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2810 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:something like a sea or a river...just moving
  • Interests:slacking

Posted 13 February 2018 - 13:25

You  can extend the envelope's overall time , by just clicking or draggin. 

 

The speed of the shortest envelope section is dependent on the underlying tpl engine

I have asked this before ( 2 years ago -) , nothing since .

Lot's of things can be improved in the instrument section , also the drive is always post envelope ( it affects  the envelopes shape ) 

 And yes ,the envelopes aretoo slow , 

 

http://forum.renoise...and-its-quirks/

And let's bump my old thread :)


Edited by gentleclockdivider, 13 February 2018 - 13:32.

THERE IS NO RELIGION SUPERIOR TO THE TRUTH


THERE IS NO TRUTH SUPERIOR TO THE ONE I CHOOSE

C'EST MIEUX D'ETRE BELLE ET REBELLE


QUE MOCHE ET REMOCHE



RUBIO RABIA

 


#3 redhoot

redhoot

    Member

  • Normal Members
  • PipPip
  • 36 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 February 2018 - 13:32

Thanks for this, wasn't aware it was already discussed.

 

I was hoping it was just a simple locked variable that could be fixed, but I understand why its a bigger issue now.