A "count In" Feature Is Very Important

[violetpow]

If you play like a musician, you need a count in of 1 or 2 “bars” before record starts.
What can i do, if i record the first note in a pattern in realtime or if i record in the middle of the pattern?
This feature with pre-quatisation of the playing notes are killer feature for more fun to shoot up samples, play melodies und feel like a f****ing musician, who can play with childlike lightness music.

I´m pleased, if you incule it in the new version.

Thanks

Pow

[jiku]

In the meantime, if you need to, make an empty 1 or 2 bar pattern before each one you want to record over, and then put a wood block sample on it.

[vvoois (vV)]

In the meantime, if you need to, make an empty 1 or 2 bar pattern before each one you want to record over, and then put a wood block sample on it.

Or use the metronome function instead of manually adding a woodblock to it.

[Marc_Shake (Marcel Schindler)]

Yeah but adding a 1 or 2 beats long in-counter would be very handy…

[Johan]

This would be a useful addition, I agree. First I thought about adding choices for count-in to the current metronome. But then I realized this would be fiddly and not fit well on the screen. So a new button for count-in would be ideal I think. This way you can choose to only have count-in or combine it with metronome.

[vvoois (vV)]

I still rather go for the metronome ticking in the background and recording starts as soon as midi or tone-key on keyboard is pressed.
You can take as much time as you need to get into the groove before jamming.

[pro_xy]

I would also like quantization …

when you write at 320+ bpm at speed 3, getting the timing correct on notes is hard as ballz.

[Johan]

I still rather go for the metronome ticking in the background and recording starts as soon as midi or tone-key on keyboard is pressed.
You can take as much time as you need to get into the groove before jamming.

Good point. What about the solution I wrote above and have the count in as a config setting, XX lines (or bars or whatever is best) or at first keypress.

[Marc_Shake (Marcel Schindler)]

I still rather go for the metronome ticking in the background and recording starts as soon as midi or tone-key on keyboard is pressed.
You can take as much time as you need to get into the groove before jamming.

Or that… Yeah, that is even better But then it should be possible to start the pattern at a specific offset.

[Tom_de_Rooy]

I would also like quantization …

me too

[vvoois (vV)]

I still rather go for the metronome ticking in the background and recording starts as soon as midi or tone-key on keyboard is pressed.
You can take as much time as you need to get into the groove before jamming.

Or that… Yeah, that is even better But then it should be possible to start the pattern at a specific offset.

From current row the cursor key is at maybe?
And if possible also the column where it is?

[jiku]

Or use the metronome function instead of manually adding a woodblock to it.

Unless he/she is like me, and can’t play against the metronome.

[Marc_Shake (Marcel Schindler)]

From current row the cursor key is at maybe?
And if possible also the column where it is?

Yep That would be great

[vvoois (vV)]

Or use the metronome function instead of manually adding a woodblock to it.

Unless he/she is like me, and can’t play against the metronome.

Probably didn’t tried to replace the wave files used to play the metronome sound?

[jiku]

Hehe. Maybe. The point was just that with compound time, shuffles, syncopation/displacement, swing time, polyrhytm, and all the rest, hearing a metronome beyond the count-in is often distracting. Atleast for me.