I do not know if is an inconsistent behavior or something to fix for future version final of Renoise 3.1…
The “Note-Off” is associated with a “Note”. Renoise delete the Note-Off already placedif you insert the Note-Off into another cell associated forever for a Note, using Caps Lock or A-key (but do not using copy & paste).Such that a Note always corresponds one Note-Off.
The problem is with Copy & Paste:
Steps (a example):
In Pattern Editor or Phrases, write a “Note” in cell five, column one.
Write a “Note-Off” in cell seven, column one (Caps Lock or A-key).
Select cells five, six and seven
Copy and paste the three cells with the cursor in cell four (above one cell of the selection).
What happens:
The Note-Off in cell seven is not deleted.
The consequence: Renoise allows two or more Note-Off for a Note.
If you repeat the steps to infinity, you can create an entire column filled with Note-Off using copy & paste (including previously selecting only the Note-Off for copy & paste).
Renoise should not erase the Note-Off leftover also using the copy & paste?Can it be corrected?
This item was moved today by a moderator. Before was in the subforum: “Renoise 3.1 Beta - Help, Support & Bugs”.I consider it a mistake or something inconsistent, incongruous, should be corrected.
For me this issue is pointless.It is not a feature, but rather a failure.It is something that should not exist.
Using copy and paste, you can create many Note-Offs trash, are useless.It makes no sense.If it’s a feature, not useful.
I understand that a note can only cut one turn, not two turn or three.If not in this manner, someone explain to me, please.
Maybe, if the note-off layer or midi event is “misused” for other stuff than a note-off? But then, why the other is deleted if manually added as singleton? Still no clue… Taktik will know.
Maybe, if the note-off layer or midi event is “misused” for other stuff than a note-off? But then, why the other is deleted if manually added as singleton? Still no clue… Taktik will know.
Therefore it is not consistent! “Caps Lock” or “A-key” … and “Copy&Paste” should not work the same way?One cleared and the other not?What is the utility of this?
Maybe the internal code of Copy&Paste allowing automatic deletion is more complicated. With A-key or Cap Lockjust change one cell. With Copy&Pasteyou can paste many cells with data.But it was not an excuse.
But I think that Renoise should prevent enter or preserve values that do not serve.Renoise must correct the user, not the user to Renoise.