I’m a long-time Max and Ableton user, now loving Renoise and Redux!!! <3 But when I have a question and try to do a web search for an answer, the experience is frustrating. I think the product name is the problem.
“Renoise” is a great product name. It describes what the product does, and it’s unique so that web searches yield great results.
IMHO, “Redux” is a bad product name. It doesn’t really describe what the product is or does, and it’s almost impossible to get good web search results.
Search for Redux, and you get a JavaScript library of the same name. To narrow the search, I add the company name, i.e. Renoise. But then most of the search results are for Renoise, not Redux. Do you see my problem?
Product names are difficult, especially when looking for English “re-” words. Would Revisit (ReViSiT) yield better search results? How about Reslot? Or even Renoisy?
Sorry to complain about something that is probably impossible to fix. I do love this software. I’ll continue watching the videos and reading the documentation.
Question:
If the company were to change the product name "Redux" to something else, what would be the 10 best alternative names of this product? (Given that other softwares are named Redux, this might be a feasible option)
Answer:
If Renoise GmbH were to change the product name "Redux" due to the existence of other software with the same name, selecting a new name that reflects the plugin’s identity as a VSTi sampler and phrase sequencer with a tracker-style interface would be key. The new name should be catchy, unique, and relevant to its features—such as sampling, sequencing, and the grid-based, pattern-oriented workflow typical of trackers. After careful consideration, here are the 10 best alternative names for the product:
* PhraseForge
This name combines "phrase" (a sequence of notes, a core feature) with "forge," suggesting the creation or crafting of music. It’s evocative and aligns perfectly with the plugin’s ability to build musical phrases.
* ReSeq
A play on "Redux," this name implies a fresh take on sequencing ("re-sequence"). It’s short, tech-savvy, and maintains a modern, innovative vibe while hinting at the plugin’s sequencing strengths.
* PatternMaster
Emphasizing the pattern-based sequencing central to trackers, this name conveys mastery and control over musical patterns, making it appealing to producers who value precision.
* GridSampler
Directly referencing the grid-based interface common in trackers and the plugin’s sampling capabilities, this name is descriptive and straightforward, highlighting key functionalities.
* NoteWeaver
A poetic option, this suggests weaving notes together into intricate compositions. It captures the creative process of sequencing and sampling in an imaginative way.
* TrackForge
Similar to "PhraseForge," this name uses "track" to nod to both the tracker style and the creation of musical tracks, offering a dynamic and relevant alternative.
* SoundSculpt
Implying the shaping and designing of sound, this name fits the sampler’s modulation features and appeals to users focused on detailed sound design.
* RhythmGrid
This combines "rhythm" (a focus of sequencing) with "grid" (the tracker interface), making it a clear and rhythmic choice that ties directly to the plugin’s strengths.
* WaveWeaver
Focusing on waveforms (the essence of sampling), this name suggests crafting sound waves into music, offering a creative and unique angle.
* SeqCraft
Blending "sequence" and "craft," this name highlights the artistry and skill involved in using the plugin to sequence music, making it both functional and appealing.
These names were selected for their relevance to the product’s features (sampling, sequencing, and tracker-style workflow), uniqueness to avoid overlap with existing software, and catchiness to attract music producers. Each name reflects the essence of what makes this plugin special while providing a fresh identity distinct from "Redux."
Tbh, I also agree that the name helps putting this plugin in the background. I’d expect it to contain something with “tracker” (or “sequencer”). But “WaveWeaver” is quite a nice name too, conceptually. I could see that cathing on better in the collective consciousness.
