Combine AHDSR and other modulation devices

[Achenar]

@KURTZ

What’s not possible is to get for example a hydra modulator in modulation set n°1 that controls the lfo of the modulation set n°2… If it’s possible to modulate without a problem a parameter between FX chains of the same instrument, why could’it it be possible to get a modulator located in modulation set one, that targets another parameter located into the modulation set 2 ?

If we can get meta devices in modulation, then I’m all for it, but that will be worked out separately from what we’re discussing within this topic.

@KURTZ

Concerning the CPU overload risk, in the past taktik declared that for each new instrument note that has to be played, a dedicated “hidden track” has to be created “on demand” and has to work hard in the background. Taktik declared that, blindly attaching FX chains to these instruments (that could be played freely on any track at any time) would quickly lead to CPU problems. And this CPU problem has been worked out by introducing a “rule” : instruments with chains/fx can only be played in one track at a given time. Extensively why not building a hydra modulator that also targets the fx chains and modulates something there ?

I’m just putting forth ideas for XRNI extension. Whether it’s feasible to allow for potentially excessive routing through polyphonic instruments, I’ll defer to the team members with technical knowledge of the situation.