I love using Renoise, but I like to use other DAWs as well.
Renoise into Live or Reaper via ReWire is okay I guess… Redux is a fine thing for incorporating into projects made in other DAWs. It’s a bit limited though. I wanna be able to use Renoise as a VSTi inside another DAW.
Same here , it was hoping redux would have midi out , .what a great combo it would make together with audio mulch ( A.M. now supports midi out but no note seq. )
I think that the lack of VSTi hosting and also the awkwardness of phrase triggering, if addressed, would really help.
It seems a shame that only samples are supported, as using Renoise to play VSTi has always been a pleasure - not to mention using it to quickly resample VSTi into sampled instruments, thats a fantastic feature.
I’d really like to see a playlist with normal patterns like Renoise, simply following the host DAW transport. Just like Renoise slaving via ReWire.
Redux is great, just seems limited for no good reason.
I can totally understand the decission of not supporting vsti , why would they do that ?
Well Renoise supports it, and it’s very nice clearly. Redux, for me, is a way of getting Renoise into another DAW, so the more Redux become like Renoise the better as far as I am concerned.
I would like it to have a pattern sequencer just like Renoise that follows the transport of the host DAW, for example, just as Renoise behaves via ReWire.
that’s debatable…but again …extra complexity and more chance of crashing
I don’t find that a particularly compelling argument against hosting VST(i) really. If you are worried about crashing because of using a hosted VST then simply don’t host VSTs. On the other hand, if you would find it extremely useful to have VSTi in Redux then, if it supported it, I might be tempted to risk everything and host a VSTi just on the offchance that it didnt crash and was massively useful instead.