Does anyone have a good way of programming septuplets and which configurations suit you best? Seems slightly more tricky to grasp than conventional tuplets
Cheers!
Would this tool be of any help? https://www.renoise.com/tools/place-selected-notes-evenly
It should be simple to use this for showing what delay values you need to use for any kind of grid.
If you are in 8 LPB it should be delays like:
- 00
- 24
- 48
- 6C
- 90
- B4
- D8
- — (let this line empty)
Not sure but quite sure 
@sokoban Looking at it this way using delay 0-255 makes much more sense, and those values closely align with the tool joule posted.
@joule This is a clever little script, thanks man
Just a thought: Consider the triplets in say 2 bars from Debussy Arabesque #1:
Attachment 7451 not found.
Two patterns in this xrns producing very very similar results, but not quite the same. Too early in the morning to consider such things 
Just a thought: Consider the triplets in say 2 bars from Debussy Arabesque #1:
Two patterns in this xrns producing very very similar results, but not quite the same. Too early in the morning to consider such things
I think the 3 8th notes in the second bar should be a triplet as well.
I think the 3 8th notes in the second bar should be a triplet as well.
The ‘triplet’ in the second bar is implied from the previous bar and the beam grouping. Debussy himself didn’t indicate ‘triplet’ time on the sets of 3 eighth notes in the original hand written score, he probably assumed you would know from the beam grouping of those notes that they are played in triple time:
Attachment 7464 not found.
The ‘triplet’ in the second bar is implied from the previous bar and the beam grouping. Debussy himself didn’t indicate ‘triplet’ time on the sets of 3 eighth notes in the original hand written score, he probably assumed you would know from the beam grouping of those notes that they are played in triple time:
Interesting, I didn’t know you may notate them this way, but yeah, it’s quite obvious. I thought you might have missed it somehow, because you said the XRNS is “not quite the same”. (I didn’t have a look at the XRNS, sorry).