Yeah, I agree it could be handy sometimes, but pretty low priority for me unless it’s a really fast and easy fix
I use mostly samples and I’ve never felt the browser needed to be bigger - well, maybe this is a fast fix too?
Besides those the top ones are all much needed features, tho I’d personally put them in a slightly different order.
I’m pretty happy how the results turned out. Though I also think subtick timing is the most important one. Still, finally we get a good mixer view! And whoever said it already has one, it’s really not the same. 
I too, like most users, think the Rewire stuff is useless [no offense to its voters]… 
I could imagine a sample browser inside the sample editor - like in html-editors: on the left side the directories, on the right bigger side the known sample view.
imho for songs/rni’s/themes the current diskbrowser is totally ok.
Oh, I get it. For people who use lots of samples in each instrument… I seldom do that.
1st i saw results i was angry and disappointed just like ermi…
But after i chill a lot, i understood that things are not too bad.
Agree: sub-tick is most important thing to emplement. Probably it needs new .rns emplementation as consequence… And probably it can cause zooming ability emplementation (it’s a god!)
Mixer window is not so important, but would be useful…
New arranger is good idea also!
So amen to this 
although i would like have seen rewire a lil bit more on the top
Personally I would have liked the rewire feature since you get a pretty nice way to use other Apps for the things that Renoise will probably not have for a while (I think).
E.g. being able to process audiostreams on the fly and record multiple seperate tracks/channels in one go etc.
At least that is what I understand will not be part of Renoise in the near future.
ok, so whats the difference between “real” mixer? except that the “real” mixer has parameters for each channel gathered in one window…
“not your priorities” = “strange priorities” ?
being able to sample and sequence in one app is a very cool feature as far as i’m concerned. it opens up alot of possibilities for live performance and increases workflow speed. it was one of my top picks.
i’m pretty happy with the results.
sub-tick timing is going to make me piss my pants. i am chewing nails over this feature
we are a mature democratic community, which is ready for tiranny 
(/me back from Buenzli+Venice)
To sample on the fly while performing live would be very cool indeed. Looks like I was the one with too little information of the planned features. 
I’m actually also pretty cool with the results. I think I can work with wot I got til some of the goodies lower down on the list are implemented. 
I thought there was going to be a second round of voting anyhow? I remember it being mentioned, because of the fact that everyone was given too many credits. I for one used them all up which was a bit silly, but feel there should be another round, to fairly narrow down the options.
i actually kept some back. knowing that if i was to use all of them, that it would be adding to features i do not want, or feel neccesary to be in renoise.
like the audio in record thing doesnt make much sense, since theres plenty of software that already does this…but i guess some people would rather do everything inside renoise, than have to open an close and open an close other apps. which is fine by me i guess. some of the others really kinda strange.
like for instance AU, the only people that would be able to use this is people running OSX, and im positive every person that uses OSX that voted marked that one with highest regards.
i could go on an on, but im sure no one wants to read me repeating what everyone else has wrote.
so i’ll stop now
Me too… but still some weirdness managed to get high scores 
Paul Rogalinski wrote:
True…
Perhaps something to consider for the next upcomming votes… Like
speare sections for osx and windows users.
On 25.08.2005 11:52, Vincent Voois wrote:
I saw the voting results and i noticed that Audio Units are at the
bottom of the list.What makes me wonder…
How many Mac users are there against the Windows users.
How many of the mac users voted for the AU?I have a slight suspicion that probably 90 to 95% of the Mac users voted
for this feature.
Yet because the Mac edition isn’t out for a long time, there are not as
many Mac users as Windows users which can make the voting results biased.Wouldn’t it be more honest, if the larger scale of specific OS users
that voted for that specific OS feature, sets the weight of priority
that a feature is going to be implemented rather than using the global
average of all votes for this priority-determination?Just my two cents.
Vince.
btw, i gave maximum credits to AU’s and i’m a Windows user, but i was too wealthy in my credits, so considered this one could use some extra weight. I don’t know who did the same, but it didn’t work.
edit by It-Alien: just a little note to let unaware people know that Paul Rogalinski is Pulsar of developers team
I’m happy with the results! And I didn’t even spend all my credits… And if I did, I think it would be strange to say that there should be a re-vote. If I want a feature more than another, I simply don’t spend the highest amount of credits on both of them.
“Only” 255 votes? I believe those who cares the most about Renoise have voted anyway, so I think it would be wrong to say that the results are not “as everyone want it”.
I can’t wait for the Mixer and Structure View!
Ok I don’t care so much about the recording in sample editor, but who knows maybe it would be something for me at the point when that version is released (in a year or two?.)
Think positive.
not “revote”. There was supposed to be another stage of voting to narrow down the results… But i guess that it would be damn hard for me to choose between mixer view and bigger arranger etc cause i dont care about any of such features right now before really important ones are implemented