Renoise 2.xx Suggestions.

It’s just a workaround, not a real solution (just like in the case of sidechaining fx).

It’s solution enough. :)

Whoa! What’s the workaround for sidechaining?

No fights bro. I talked about Kaneel in this video, thats it. ) not you.
I`m not really bashing pianoroll. I dont understand why this in renoise, when you can type notes by keyboard. In standart DAWs, as much as i know, you cant do this. So, thats why there is a pianoroll or external virtual keyboards.

oh yes, +1 for synced audio tracks.

wow. thanks. it works.

p.s. same thing for VST `ll be great too.

this sounds like a good solution really.

check this, its very good.
http://flstudio.image-line.com/documents/edison.html

and costs like 2 RNS licenses.

but no version for os x YET.

or this, even cheaper.

http://flstudio.image-line.com/documents/slicex.html

holy shit. it still in stock nowadays… i thought its a dead dinosaur. holy sh… i think for this money you can afford the same but in hardware today.

sample offset is useless in the situation i`ve described. its not a workaround or solution.

i appreciate the idea of sample position pointers. i guess, 255 of them per sample would be enough.

for addressing the pointers via pattern command we could sacrifice the “0B00” command (0B00 = no nothing, 0B01 = play sample backwards), which is ridiculous, because it wastes $FE possible effect values and can also be accomplished via “B0 / B1” in volume or panning column.

Heh? And what if you’re using the volume and the panning column already? for, uhm, volume and panning?

I’d rather see effects go beyond “F”, that would allow for twenty more effects without “sacrificing” anything…

Would I then be able to run Mac plugins from Mac and Tux plugins from Linux into CP host?

Theoretically yes, it depends mostly on how this useful technology will be implemented in Renoise. But i think it`s a hardest way.

Renoise standard instrument format has sample slots. You can even chop the samples quite easily even though it’s not automated.