Signal follower device improvements collection

Ideas & suggestions
1

A new thread where we can collect all suggestion for a improvement of the signal follower device.

I start with:

  • Make destination target track field larger, do not write “SXX”, instead write directly the send track name. Since SXX has no relation anymore to a track if the track was renamed.
    post-5192-0-55793100-1400863446.jpg

(Without the “S2:” of course, and not so ugly like above)

  • If a new destination is assigned, the sf should reset the value to the same reset max value as the target device (or better min and max to the reset value of the target), not to -INF/MAX… E.g. target is a gainer device, assigning it will result in huge unwanted volume boost first.

  • Do not erase destination when storing / restoring A/B quick presets

  • Instead “LP filter” and “HP filter”, these two sliders could be joined into one range slider (LP + HP at once), and a select box for a switchable filter type, including the new filters from Redux in the signal follower, and at least one steep filter (currently it’s kind of 12db filter I think)

  • The switch-bar L/R/L+R could be a select box with L, R, L+R, Mid, Side

Please add your suggestions…

BTW. limiting the search to July 2014 in the forum completely sucks, because Renoise 3.01 is already older than that, and there are a lot of feature requests before that.

2

BTW. limiting the search to July 2014 in the forum completely sucks

The quick search is mainly intended to find recent activity. If you want to search more in-depth, you can use the advanced search (the cog wheel icon next to the search field above) where you can set a specific date range, set how the matching works, only find stuff by a specific user, etc.

Alternatively, Google can often dig up stuff that is a bit tricky to find using the forum’s built in search function.

Just enter a query like:
site:forum.renoise.com some keywords here
site:forum.renoise.com “this exact phrase”
etc.

3

Sugestion:

Multiple Destinations for the signal follower (so 1 signal follower can influence more than just 1 parameter / other channel) would come in very handy!

Something similar as done in Multiband Send but without different frequencies…

4

Sugestion:

Multiple Destinations for the signal follower (so 1 signal follower can influence more than just 1 parameter / other channel) would come in very handy!

Something similar as done in Multiband Send but without different frequencies…

Can’t you just use multiple signal followers for that?

5

Sugestion: Multiple Destinations for the signal follower

Signal Follower → Hydra → 9 outputs which can be scaled independently → Profit?

6

Another suggestion for the signal follower device:

  • Knee parameter , just like in bus compressor, since curves alone are not precise enough

The knee parameter could be a slider ranging from negative dB to positive dB , so it could maybe replace the curve select box?