Hey there. When I was a kid, I learned the notes as “do ré mi fa sol la si”. Later, I discovered that there is a widespread use of “A B C D E F G”. I can understand it is easier to remember, but I’ve wondered about two related things :
The two notations doesn’t start from the same note, as “A == La” …
… but the octaves are numbered starting from “C == Do” !
So you get something like
C1 D1 E1 F1 G1 A1 B1 C2 D2 E2 F2 G2 …
Which leads to the conclusion that B1 is actually a higher note than C1.
I’ve always thought “WTF !!??” about this. anyone has an explanation ?
If it makes you feel any better, when you start talking about written music, ‘c’ is middle c, and c1 is an octave above… ‘C’ is an octave below and ‘C.’ is an octave below that.
I think pianos are the reason. Musical notation used A - G (starting from A) for voices & stuff in the early days, but pianos got build in “do ré mi fa sol la si” layers. So we are actually using the piano / “do ré mi fa sol la si” notation for octaves, while using the old names for the notes…
damn, wikipedia has some very interesting stuff on the subject. it looks like the “a b c” notation comes from ancient greece and was adopted by germans and anglo-saxons, while the “do ré mi” notation appeared during the 11th century.
in ancient greece, they were using a reduced number of octaves :
A B C D E F G a b c d e f g aa bb cc dd ee ff gg
and the “gamma” allows to express the notes below A.
but there is nothing about this inconsistency. I guess this is what happens when two standards collide …