- WALL OF TEXT *
I get the impression that you are more interested in your own ideas than in knowledge. Some kind of pseudo-intellectual masturbation.
Instead of admitting that your argument was invalid, you produced a wall of text ranting about irrelevant topics.
I hereby kindly decline to continue this conversation 
@joule: I see much of every comment you write always starts and ends with word like ābsā, ānonsenseā, āmasturbationā , āirrelevantā ārantā and so on and I am more than sure that if I put your gems through a spam filter it would filter it out as spam or porn. So my question is why are adding to it? Not much of substance apart from all that ātextā.
Also not getting engaged in a debate intellectual or not automatically puts you out of it, so why bother to let everyone know. Not sure if I missed you in the first place.
But hey we all love Renoise so why donāt we quite quibbling and either put forward genuine debate worthy arguments or just go about your usual routine. No one is forcing you to answer.
PS: I inverted your own fallacy back to your baseline, seems you have run out of steam.
You seem to wield a very keen mind, encrypted, though the speed and elaboration of your posts might at times make it a bit strenous for other people to try to follow, if their minds are not as vivid as yours seems. it is interesting to co note on your point that a āgodā cannot create anything more complex than himselfā¦that humans are already both capable as well as still incapable of it. I think we are already able to create rationaly analysis and evaluation tools, that in power surpass our own mindās ability to juggle with information by great leaps. We could even try to simulate our own descision finding in those tools, though we are maybe better of to still only use these logic machines as pure analysis tools, not as descision making entities, as our own engineering is far from infallible. We created such methods that can surpass our own reasoning, by being able to handle abstraction, and to share the work to large groups people going an evolutionalry approach, and each dedicating himselfs to single facets of the created machines to surpass the limitations in thinking that a single individuum would have trying to do it alone.
at the same time we still cannot surpass ourselves in another thing that is about our own mind, that we simply cannot understand yet how it worksā¦it is about the illusion present in our consciousness, and consciousness itself. It could be simulated in simplified ways, but not recreated by us. It is there and seems to possess great power and depth in creating a reality, and it reflects all our senses and the results of inner workings. yet it would not need to, for us to function from viewed from the outside, to act the same way as we do with, we could do completely without if more simple mechanisms would replace it, theoretically I think. And we really donāt know a shit about it, what it is composed of, how it is created (by the brain?), what dimensions it has and potentially could have, and also what is the spectator watching parts of it all the time. It is probably one of the biggest remaining mysteries inside the range of existant things already encountered by us. I chuckle a bit at the thought, that there are people who dedicate their time to argue thatā¦earth is a flat disc (besides their main point is probably not about the disc thing, but rather about generally questioning the truthfullness of information given to them by other peopleā¦), when they could have much more fun on this special topic.
Regarding the reverb thing, you might find your joy in reading books about psychoaccoustics. It is also a very interesting topic for electronic musicians and mixing/mastering enineers, and can aid greatly in finding ways to produce more effective music specifically geared towards the human perception of sounds. You will find, that whatever creates consciousness and the illusion of sound we are perceiving (and can let us hear the reverb tail seperate from the excitation sound under certain circumstances, I believe technically this should already be possible, though it is a process about much tuning and using lots of data of spatial relevance and excessive computingā¦might even be able to reconstruct outlines of the space a reverb is happening inā¦), is quite some apt imposter on us, letting us ever only see single aspects of the sound, but at the same time having the impression of perceiving the whole thing while in reality we donāt. Also I find a certain technique fun, to let a sound seemingly have more body, by adding reverb to it but destroying its spatial cues and tail in certain ways, so the mind is tricked to not view it as spatial reaction any more. You know a bit like gated drums. Then you can reverb the new hazy sound object, and the mind will perceive the (altered) reverb inside a space with reverb that still tricks the mind to be perceived spatially.
Regarding the reverb thing, you might find your joy in reading books about psychoaccoustics.
I had a great time reading this one: This is Your Brain on Music
Although itās got ābrainā in the title, itās clearly more interested in the intricacies of the mind.
@Oopslfly, thanks 
I do agree that our mental faculties can be collectively used for a more coherent research and not regret later on a wasted opportunity. Books are no doubt plenty for anyone including me to get our heads around for music phenomena. @Danoise mentions Your Brain On Music and I read that partially some time back, it is riveting and a great read, time to go and finish it.
Nah, itās nonsense.
If the Earth were flat, where wouldAgartha and the rest of Hollow Earth be ?
Me doesnt really believe that Earth is flat; yet I do know that the Moon is.
#obviously
Me doesnt really believe that Earth is flat; yet I do know that the Moon is.
#obviously
Yep, suspicious how itās always facing the same side towards us. Makes you thinkā¦
man in the moon himself tells me we only see the bulls eye of the door heās living behind, he has some fancy slowly rotating mood light inside, and likes to watch earth from there all the time
I wish the earth was flat
Good science is obviously useful when the results from experiments are reproducable but there are also scientists who use the wrong statistical analysis to confirm their hypotheses even when their hypotheses were clearly wrong. Experiments can be twisted and made to suit whatever company funded them.
For example, tobacco companies which ādiscoveredā through experimentation that tobacco is harmless or drugs companies who āfoundā that their opiate drugs are harmless. Or the slave owner bastards who ādiscoveredā the disease ādrapetomaniaā. Or like someone said earlier psychiatrists who decided that they could get paid to stab people in the head or electrocute themā¦sure those things will reduce ātalking behaviourā or āwriting behaviourā or whatever.
Its important to remember just how completely evil and selfish people can be.
Being a scientist with a scientific method doesnt equate to being good for humanity.
There are scientists that will develop and sell disgusting weapons to anyone who can pay.
DNA weapons, mind weapons, microwave weaponsā¦the list goes on.
Morality is stilll important, but both morality and intelligence are difficult to define.
The problem in what kinds of science recieves funding stems from mafia-like simpleton thugs who only understand profit ( oil companies, weapons companies, drugs companies etc.).
So Iād say in that way science can be just as bad as religion.
werdā¦
also flat earth is lame yo
Yep, suspicious how itās always facing the same side towards us. Makes you thinkā¦
But butā¦ The moon has many phases(faces?) , Full moon, half moon half crescent,full crescent and no moon nights too. And what about the dark side of the moon! Also is there any relationship with āmoonshineā?
The only thing all scientists can agree upon is that we know collectively less than a drop in the ocean of knowledge or a number so infinitesimal that representing it in a computer will cause it to become a denormal number. #scientistsdontknowsh**
By comparison if a musician tells you he does not know any note name or how to sight reading etc and cannot play 2 chords one might analytically surmise he is an idiot. But that is the trick about art, itās directly connected to the ultimate hotline of our creator and the universal mind. The artist does not need to engage in analysis to be inspired, in fact inspiration is what all artists chase for rest of their lives, not analysis. We can also call such musicians if they cannot even make music, ātone deafā very safely , because āthey can hear the sound but cannot hear the musicā.
A scientist if lucky gets inspired, otherwise spends rest of his life doing analysis. Tries to engineer a man made convoluted system of communication technology using earthbound materials aka telephone line, to have a conversation with his maker. Scientists are tone deaf for real.
#sciencehasreachedadeadend
#technologylivesfornow
Science was originally invented as a branch of philosophy and technology to make life easier, not more convoluted.
Just in the process of pure investigation, kindly watch this Greek talk show from a recent episode and try to objectively debunk or analyse what this guest is talking about. At the very least give him some kudos for his sincerity, becos I feel there is lot of truth to what he is saying. Far better than the usual violence and sex paraphernalia you get to see on āmainstreamā TV. At least makes you think for once. Take it as a philosophy debate before making it a āscientificā one. He also makes an allowance saying that his āmodelā better serves the results of his observations and inferences than the round earth spinning model, which is welcome any day. He is not dogged about anything like Richard Dawkins is. In my hypothetical opinion earth could very well be an inverted bowl taking cues from both flat and round earth.
If there is a lot of botched science floating to the top and the regular scientist outlawed then only outlaws will be scientists.
ādrapetomaniaā
Today I learnedā¦
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drapetomania
What a pile of insane bullshit.
"In 1884, meridian time personnel met
in Washington to change Earth time.
First words said was that only 1 day
could be used on Earth to not change
the 1 day bible. So they applied the 1
day and ignored the other 3 days.
The bible time was wrong then and it
proved wrong today. This a major lie
has so much evil feed from itās wrong.
No man on Earth has no belly-button,
it proves every believer on Earth a liar.
Children will be blessed for
Killing Of Educated Adults
Who Ignore 4 Simultaneous
Days Same Earth Rotation.
Practicing Evil ONEness -
Upon Earth Of Quadrants.
Evil Adult Crime VS Youth.
Supports Lie Of Integration.
1 Educated Are Most Dumb.
Not 1 Human Except Dead 1.
Man Is Paired, 2 Half 4 Self.
1 of God Is Only 1/4 Of God.
Bible A Lie & Word Is Lies."
-TIME CUBE
@ConnorBW:
Its a shame the same oppressors who came up with the insane bullshit of ādrapetomaniaā ( the disease of the mind which made slaves want to run away from the plantation ) have now brought us āoppositional defiant syndromeā ( the disease of the mind which makes people want to disobey āauthorityā ).
Its basically the same thing. Somehow they got away with calling these things āscienceā.
The ācureā for drapetomania was to cut off the big toes so that the slave could not run.
The ācureā for oppositional defiant is to dope the person up on opiates in prison so they can not run, until they obey.
If they still refuse to obey the ācureā is forceful brain poisoning or forceful brain-damaging electrocution.
In the non-scientific world of psychiatry a poison can be a āmedicationā, while electrocution can be a ātherapyā.
The main psychiatric ātherapyā, for a long time was stabbing people in the head ( lobotomy ), but when people started to question how on earth damaging someones brain by head stabbing could ever be medicine they changed their tactics and started poisoning the brain and damaging the brain through electrocution. To this day they still get away with calling brain poisoning āmedicationā and electrocution ātherapyā.
Completely non-scientific stuff being sold by greedy oppressors as if it was sophisticated science.
So many people, without realising it are backing up these non-scientific tools of oppression using the jargon of the oppressors who are percieved as sophisticated and succsessful so that they can too can be percieved as sophisticated and succsessful. For example, it has become fashinable recently for people to say āI am really obsessive compulsiveā about something or ā[something] is in his DNAāā¦
The language of oppression is common in our everyday vocabulary. For example āimbecileā, āidiotā, āmoronā, āretardā are all born of non-scientific oppression being sold as science.
Flat earth is complete bullshit. More non-scientific stuff being sold as science.
First they introduce all these āfun conspiraciesā ( flat earth, aliens, reptilians etc. ).
Once people are able to accept these kinds of things as truths, then any lie can be concieved of as truth.
This kind of mythology is dangerous and the ultimate tool of control to turn people against one another.
Probably not many flat earthers here. The BS superstition of choice among musicians is 432hz.
Ah,the sharp-Earth theoryā¦
This goes a bit deep, so I donāt expect you to understand:
The concept of āreal menā is a gynocentric shaming tactic. By adopting that concept, youāve already submitted to the authority that is gynocentrism. Ergo: you are pussy whipped without even knowing it.
Bugger.
Since you didnāt understandā¦ Iām pointing out that youāre contradicting yourself. Other than that, you could have gotten your message thru way better without using old shaming tactics. Youāre reproducing the very norms that you try to ācriticizeā.
Soā¦ -1 for suboptimal message and lack of awareness there.
Random thought from me: Please try to keep the ongoing discussion civil, ok dudes?
Being forced to step in and wave around the moderator stick sucks. Cleaning up damaged threads sucks. Pissing off members who think weāre somehow taking sides in the argument sucks.
So just remember this is the Renoise forum. Yes this is in the off-topic section, but letās keep it within reason, keep it ālightā, and just try to treat each other with a modicum of respect, yeah?
A bit too much drama around here lately. Seems really unnecessary.
Cheers.
Apparently people think A432Hz is holy or something.
āBefore standardization, the pitch of A fluctuated heavily between 400 Hz and 460 Hzā.
Their tuning forks were not that accurate.
āThe british standards Institute arranged an international conference in London in 1939 where it was internationally agreed for A=440Hz to be the standardā.
I have heard a lot of tracker music in which all the instruments in a song are tuned to a random sample or an old school .xi instrumentā¦In tracker music in general, the pitch of A probably fluctuates even more than those classical guys with their battered old tuning forksā¦not to mention how messed up the tuning in some FM instruments or supersaw instruments is. Awesome to explore out of tune and dischordant stuff but in the end it is good to have perfect tuning and harmonyā¦people went too far with that wall of noise style its just irritating.
