Artist [burial] Writes Whole Album In Soundforge, Actually Sounds Pret

:unsure: :blink: :drummer:

No we don’t need Cubase, but some people actually don’t need anything but a sample editor. Most surprising thing: it’s actually a pretty good album (well I think so).

http://blackdownsoundboy.blogspot.com/2006…oy_archive.html

http://www.chemical-records.co.uk/sc/servl…?Track=HDBCD001

Yeah I quite enjoy this album myself. I had no idea it was done only with Soundforge though. That’s very impressive considering the fact that Soundforge has no multi-track features.

here is a brilliant mix by one of my friends on slsk,
http://noise.scribbleminded.com/annias/set…ep_Volume_1.mp3
diggin the sublo an substep for many months.
my favorite burial choon is near the end.
burial-spaceape is LOW! an SSSSSLLLLLOOOOOOWWWW

hey, maybe this should be in another thread, but this is somewhat suited for this conversation. ive noticed some ppl calling sound editors like audacity,‘trackers’.

i just now see the server of that set slow to a halt! hah!

since the idea has peoples interest, the very first electronic track I ever made (before ever even getting my hands on sequencing software, etc) was in something, arguably, even more simplistic than soundforge (creative wave studio v4.02) using tones generated from the distortion of my sound card, a couple of distorted drum hits and a few violin/vocal samples…I think I’ve talked about this with a few of you guys previously; “fields of 'nam” - its the first track of this set I posted up ages ago:

http://www.renoise.com/board/index.php?sho…mp;hl=breakcore

I havent been able to reproduce the technique; lost heart in it with the loss of all the original samples…and the discovery of trackers :)