well by the way I thought a lot how can AI help in writing music or will it not be my thing anymore? Here is a small example I had a sketch that I didn’t really know where to go and here he did everything beautifully based on my demo.
original
after suno
It was useful for me, and I began to understand more clearly how it can be developed in such cases. I would like to have such an assistant who could help with the arrangement of the project with the suggestion of various options. It helps to find options to finish the track and learn.
I get what you’re saying, and yeah, AI music is only going to get more common. But I don’t think it’s all bad, if anything, it forces human artists to push creativity even further. AI might generate decent compositions, but it still lacks that raw emotion and unpredictability that makes music truly special. Do you think AI could ever capture that, or will it always just be a tool rather than an artist?
Real soucecode can, and has, been able to replicate a human workflow for several decades now,
and yes, with training or feedback on it’s performance; the codebase, data, and it’s dispatch tables
can evolve.
I also use AI in development, and it’s fascinating how much it can optimize workflows and bring new possibilities. But like anything, it comes with its own set of challenges. Whenever I run into issues, I turn to mobile development for solutions that help streamline the process. Just sharing in case it’s useful!
No. AI can never be an artist, because it’s not human.
There will always be a missing link, which is emotion.
I suddenly have a question after seeing a bunch of AI generated blog post over the internet:
If they are not going to put an effort into their creation, why should I put an effort to read, listen or watch their “creations”?
For many times, I can often spot if the article is written by human or ChatGPT because it often has a specific format; however, why should I care for an AI generate content if I can just do the same but better because I have the control over the prompts?
LLM can generate music, but I really want to know more about the story of the track behind artists and what the track means to the artist instead of some arbitrary generated music interpreted by the same model.
I like the idea of a conceptual compositional arms race between humans and machines driving forward evolution in music…
Of course, ultimately it is a cooperative endeavor. It’s so interesting seeing humans feeling threatened by the illusion of agency manifested by AI. I appreciate how AI simultaneously humbles and elevates human’s sense of their own capacities.
Interesting times
I suppose the real question is, can you make a song?
At this point one have to admit that not every single song has a story. Sometimes the whole story is “just hit hard” or “make them dance”. But every single tone, every single note, everything inside that song was set that way because of human emotion. No AI could do this, regardless of the prompt.
Using “cheat” stuff like Scaler 3 is a “cooperative endeavor”. Using AI that does all the work isn’t.
Yes, I can. Hundrets, thousands of songs. Wanna hear some?
I used to think to share those in the thread for sharing music made by Renoise or other daws in some days, but I guess I am a bit silent on posting my music here, so here you go and hope you enjoy it. Besides, I am working a hybrid track, a mixture between orchestral and synthwave, about self-awareness, also done in SunVox. Renoise does give me a great help because I use it to port my orchestral samples into xi instruments for sunvox.
I used to study AI (Not anymore because I got higher priority in learning some other things before going back to AI), and I really have no issue and I am fearless on researching a topic using them because they are actually good for narrowing down a topic so that I can do a more precise search given result from the prompt, but I am more about being annoyed by the spam of AI contents. I remembered I was trying to search a topic about recent fusion breakthrough, and after clicked the first search result on a search engine which is a blog post, I saw that was clearly written by chatgpt due to its unique format. If this is the case, why don’t I just go to chatGPT and ask the question there which I can further ask it for more details and let it show me the reference, but to see someone’s exact one response from chatGPT from their exact one prompt? I read blogs because I want to see someone’s different opinions, not to see people parroting the same message from an LLM model. This applies to music as well, if everyone just use Suno to generate audio, why should I even border to listen those contents if I can basically do the same for my own?
I don’t fear about AI because you may see that I also use it for research purpose and I did attempt to study it, but I fear about people being so addicted to it in a way that they are losing the sense of individual thinking and reasoning, and they just consume whatever it is came from some LLM models without a second thought. It is already pretty bad since social media was being mainstream, and I don’t want to see it worsen.
Agreed on this one. Some composers really have put some efforts on their melodies with a precise use of articulations. Their slur and staccato on a specific note, their sudden accents, their use of different decorative notes, can really precisely describe a moment and an environment, just like good writers who have rich vocabulary able to describe a situation in details. AI can’t really do this because they don’t really know why we are using that articulation for a particular situation besides statistics and probabilities on a data set.
