I really really really hate that this woman has a good chance at becoming 2nd in line in charge of my country.
You know, as much as I despise Obama’s loud mouth, ignorant supporters, I think he has been running a fantastic campaign, at least relative to McCain’s.
This VP pick was 100% political, and it really shows how little the McCainites care about the United States.
But on the other hand, Obama is very left of the spectrum. He was utterly wrong about the troop surge (of course the defeatist liberal types don’t give a shit). If I vote for him, its because Im voting against McCain.
I fucking hate elections…
i think mccain & obama smell funny in a bad way.
Palin seems alright, i like that type of aggression in females.
plus i love people that fuck over corrupt politicians in the biggest sorts of way.
that guy running for vp on obama’s side is a snake too.
anyway it’s a soap opera, these people have nothing to do with wars being created. it’s the writers that need our attention.
Who in the world would be better advisor in politics than Matt Damon. He also fucked Sarah Silverman.
THE BUSH DOCTRINE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaSECfQqty8
A holy war?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmHestg8sPA
That Bush Doctrine question was BS. There have been multiple versions of the Bush Doctrine.
Read this, its from the guy who actually coined the term:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte…8091202457.html
Now granted, I don’t think Palin has foreign policy experience, but the media sure as hell isn’t drilling Obama as much as they are her.
Obama has the ability to gloss stuff over with ivy-league language and misdirection…
…which is exactly what makes him a great politician.
I disagree:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJH2n4aFEhA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XW7tkN-_GM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJiBDu5gWtc
And a montage of Fox attacks on Obama:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouKJixL–ms
That isn’t really a direct comparison. I think O’Rielly would have been just as rough on Palin.
Take for example Gibson’s interview with Obama versus his interview with Palin.
Compare the 2 sets of questions he asks:
To Obama:
How does it feel to break a glass ceiling?
How does it feel to “win”?
How does your family feel about your “winning” breaking a glass ceiling?
Who will be your VP?
Should you choose Hillary Clinton as VP?
Will you accept public finance?
What issues is your campaign about?
Will you visit Iraq?
Will you debate McCain at a town hall?
What did you think of your competitor’s [Clinton] speech?
To Palin:
Do you have enough qualifications for the job you’re seeking? Specifically have you visited foreign countries and met foreign leaders?
Aren’t you conceited to be seeking this high level job?
Questions about foreign policy
-territorial integrity of Georgia
-allowing Georgia and Ukraine to be members of NATO
-NATO treaty
-Iranian nuclear threat
-what to do if Israel attacks Iran
-Al Qaeda motivations
-the Bush Doctrine
-attacking terrorists harbored by Pakistan
Is America fighting a holy war? [misquoted Palin]
You can read the transcripts here if you’d like:
No offense but much of the rest of the world thinks US foreign policy is horrible, regardless who’s president.
I subscribe to the ideas of America’s most decorated military general of all time:
- Take the profit out of war.
- Permit the youth of the land who would bear arms to decide whether or not there should be war.
- Limit military forces to home defense purposes.
As for the rest of it all, America has it’s own values. And I wish your country the best of luck choosing a new president. Looks like it’s going to be an ugly fight as usual.
Yeah, this is true. But the president has the ability to change our foreign policy, so I don’t see how it wouldn’t matter.
Of course there will always be certain arab states which detest the united states because of our support of Israel.
The polls have showed that Obama is popular among foreign countries: http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/elec…6-12-poll_N.htm
In Brazil, politicans are actually changing their names to Barack Obama: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/1…zil.barackobama
For some strange reason, US elections always seem to end up with even odds. If only half as much effort was put into actually governing your country, than winning the presidential race, things would be a lot better.
In other news, the Canadian Conservative party has recently decided to hold a federal election in October of this year… this after they passed a bill stating that elections should be held every 4 years on a fixed date… the first of which was scheduled to happen in October 2009.
In a completely unrelated story, the Conservative party of Canada is up 10% in the polls, enough to win them a majority if they were to have an election right away… too bad that bill they passed holds off the election till 2009… oh… wait…
I sincerely hope that both Canada and the US don’t end up with a Conservative majority… if that happens, say hello to the new North American super-country, the “Amero” dollar, and an open border policy between Mexico, the US and Canada.
Also, say goodbye to the environment, and all of your personal rights and freedoms.
Well, true conservatives are all about protecting personal rights and freedoms. The term conservative takes on a completely different meaning in present day US.
Conservatives are only about protecting those rights and freedoms that fall in line with christian dogma, and those rights and freedoms that corporations, as legally valid living entities, have. Which reminds me, is a corporate merger legally the same thing as homosexual marriage?
i like super-country idea, That sounds like a load of fun!!!
then we can speak Le Amexicalishese.