Keybinds for FX parameters please 
I hope one day there will be a button that will rotate the Renoise interface 90 degrees like this:
That would be cool.
2 Likes
Still wishing for a āMaster Tuneā like Reason has: Even made a post about it 4 years ago 
Renoise Master Tuning
2 Likes
Yeah, that would be dope to be able to automate
1 Like
quick fix, just rotate monitor 
3 Likes
I see, thank you. Last night I set up a send track to a headphone only out. I will try mixing two tracks with one going to main and both going to headphones using the spacebar to sync the track thats only in my head. Almost like a real dj but with renoise.
1 Like
ā¢Higher Beatsync length (1024)
ā¢Routing plugins through the Instrument FX
ā¦Native Synth with Granular Engine!!! 
Other than that eliminate all other requests from me lol. Tools can accomplish a lot from piano roll to pretty much anything I can think of
1 Like
Better usage of multicore CPUs is all I need.
Everything else is a bonus.
1 Like
I rotated my monitor, but I hear no changes in the master tuning.
3 Likes
itās normal issue 
The monitor needs to be rotated fast enough to match the frequency of the desired tuning.
1 Like
It would be nice to have the ability to copy samples from one instrument to another (easily). There are some hackarounds to this (e.g., navigate to the song in the browser>song>samples; open up two instances of Renoise), but it would be nice to be able to just copy/paste using the usual commands.
Also, rendering to sample always creates a lower volume result. y tho?
I said it before, I donāt think threads like this are very motivating for the dev(s).
1 Like
Why not? A user-driven development path seems like it would be a great asset to the devs for turning out updates with desirable feature sets. More updates = higher version number = quicker license renewals = profits and a better product.
It just doesnāt seem like renoise is much of a development priority, thoughā¦ Taktik has been MIA for months now, yes?
3 Likes
Could be heās working on the new sononym version also, but I donāt know. And I think he has a regular job.
Yeah, I donāt think this is a bad thing (unless people make it a bad thing). In all the years on/off with Renoise I donāt think Iāve ever posted before in this thread, but it seemed like the right place to be like "hey, this would be cool to have.ā
Iām, like, also more that 100% happy with Renoise - and part of the reason I am is because this is clearly a passion project for the devs. They work on it when they can, and when they do add things, it only makes it better (without, generally, breaking a bunch of other shit). Often their updates take into account common requests and/or things that āmake senseā - so I think it canāt hurt to (respectfully) talk about things weād like.
4 Likes
What makes you think that?
From what Iāve seen, people arenāt demanding things in this thread. Just making a wish list. If nothing else, it serves as a thermometer for what people in this thread, a vocal minority, Iām sure, are interested in. Some of which might be relatively easy to implement. While other suggestions will never, ever happen. Regardless, it seems like a good thing to know. Even if it has no bearing on your development plans or timetable.
2 Likes
gentle bump for this. 10 cores enabled, i hit renoise with 72% cpu (on the edge of xrun crackle fest) activity monitor reports 17% 
2 Likes
Iād like to be able to reset LFOs from the automation editor
Yes, the LFOs could be improved. I would like to see the LFOās amplitude not moving (after the destination was adjusted) until the LFO gets activated, and furthermore I would like to be able to start the amplitudeās movement at a specific starting point. Otherwise it could be a pain in the ass to render the song until the sound thatās influenced by the LFO sounds as desired. Once I had a song which I had to render at least 8 times until it sounded right.