as promised during alpha stage, I will never surrender to the disappearance of sample editor’s loop fine editor, as it is an useful addition to the sample tools and I see no reason for it to disappear.
1 Like
+1 IT-Alien for president.
I still support for the perfection of the seemless auto-looper as an alternative.
+1000 for the “loop fine editor”!
Regarding x-fade loop: start by making it work, I can’t believe I’m the only one that thinks its broken and useless as is:
+1
…also…where is the scissor, cutting icon in the sample editor? I do a lot of sample prep work, making sample selections and shaving bits off using the scissor with the mouse.
I know ctrl+x works as well, but when mousing around in the sample editor the icon worked fine, I guess part of my workflow.
I want my loop fine editor back 
I don’t think I ever used it myself and just by the name of it had no idea what it was, but I can definitely see its usefulness and don’t see any reason for its removal, hence ++this-suggestion.
There is new function that makes very fast fade in and fadeout so i think it is less needed than ever…
- 1, bring it back.
Fading the sample edges is unnecessary and not at all the same thing.
Besides, end-fading doesn’t work (out well) for looped samples.
+1001 for the “loop fine editor”!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
come back, features!
1 Like
as well please return buttons for paste mixpaste and trimm!!!
+1
To what extent can this be perfected, realistically?
The fine editor has been invaluable for me in the past - unless I can be convinced of a viable and practical alternative, another +1 here.
At least to a level that is a lot better than it currently is.
One user wanted to make a point of proof by providing a simple python script that does a better job than the one in the Render Plugin to Instrument does.
I’m not want to point towards that example specifically, but just mention that the current method is just a rough processing method that totally misses out on various type of samples
I’ve seen some granular phrase snippets passing around, i haven’t looked into those in detail, but i suspect they mangle with the sample offset commands which is a trick that brings out a pretty good “seemless loop” experience without actually having the sample looped seemlessly…
buy a mouse with a scroll-wheel? *snarky comment
+1
I really miss the fine editor.
Absolutely bad idea to remove it, very important function.
Get it back!